Nissan Leaf vs Nissan Note

Nissan Note

 

How does the running costs of the Nissan Leaf compare to the Nissan Note?

 

I think that’s time to stop comparing electric cars between them if they have little in common other than the powertrain. In order to the electric cars become mainstream we have to compare them with similar gas cars, where the main difference is the powertrain.

We all know the many advantages electric cars have when compared to their gas counterparts, but most persons only want to know how much money in gas would they save by switching to electric. Saved money first, then higher torque, quietness and cool gadgets come as bonus.

 

Let’s find out by comparing two similar cars, but with very different powertrains. The Nissan Leaf and the Nissan Note.

 

Since Nissan Iberia (Portugal and Spain) is the first to have the 30 kWh battery available in the entry level Visia trim, I’ll use Portugal as an example to compare the Nissan Leaf to the Nissan Note.

 

In both cases, the following prices require that you trade in a car. In the Leaf’s case the car for trade in must have at least 10 years because the price also includes the Government subsidy of 2.250 € – to get rid of old and more polluting cars – on top of the Nissan’s incentive.

 

Nissan Note:

Price: 12.450 € – 14.265 € (trims for gas versions only, no diesel)

Consumption: 7,1 L/100 km – 9,869 €/100 km (1,39 € per liter)

 

Nissan Leaf:

Price: 26.015 € (entry level Visia with 30 kWh)

Consumption: 16 kWh/100 km – 3,2 €/100 km (0,2 € per kWh)

You save 6,669 € per 100 km by using the Nissan Leaf.

 

I used the highest gas Note trim versus the lowest Leaf trim with the 30 kWh battery. The higher battery capacity is important because the more range you get, the faster you can reach the tipping point where you saved enough gas to compensate the price difference.

The price difference between the two cars is 11.750 € and it takes 176.188 km in the Leaf to break even. That’s more than the battery warranty of 160.000 km.

If you are able to charge it for free you save 9,869 € every 100 km by driving the electric car. Then it would take 119.059 km to break even.

At least in Portugal the Government is in the right track by progressively increase gas taxes while keeping electric cars free from most taxes. As a result the tipping point where the lower running costs compensate for the initial higher purchase price will be easier to achieve.

 

I think that in most cases it’s crazy to buy a new car, especially an electric car that has a high depreciation rate, great deals can be found in pre-registered cars. You can save as much as 4.000 € and then buying a Leaf 30 kWh is a no brainer.

Also with new generations coming, buying an used first generation electric car will be cheaper and more appealing for those who want to save money by switching to electric cars.

 

 

More info:

http://www.fuelly.com/car/nissan/note

http://pt.globalpetrolprices.com/Portugal/gasoline_prices/

http://configurador.nissan.pt/leaf

http://configurador.nissan.pt/note

Pedro Lima

More than natural resources, are wasted human resources that bothers me the most. That’s why I’m a strong advocate of a society based on cooperation, not competition, that helps every individual to reach his full potential so that he can contribute back to society. “From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”.

You may also like...

9 Responses

  1. Terawatt says:

    Interesting comparison.

    There are two things I want to react to. First, the logic motivating choosing the 30 kWh car is flawed. How quickly you reach a particular mileage depends on your driving pattern, not how big your tank is. Same thing for battery cars.

    I also wonder about your no-brainier for the pre-registered LEAF. €4000 is a good chunk of the initial gap, but ignores that you can buy a pre-registered Note as well, perhaps saving €1500. I haven’t done the math but it’s not an obvious no-brainer IMO.

    I reckon the best result for the EV would be if you compared a 2014 LEAF to a 2014 Note. The former will have lost more value percentage-wise and even more in absolute terms, so the initial outlay difference becomes much smaller. Break-even may be possible in three years then – ignoring lower maintenance costs, but also occasional fast charging.

  2. Pedro Lima says:

    The bigger battery makes longer trips possible so you travel more with the car. Also in Portugal the 24 kWh battery is practically discontinued and it’s more expensive than the 30 kWh.

    The main point is that an electric car makes sense if you plan to drive at least 100.000 km. The more you drive it not only saves you money in gas, but you also enjoy more the perks of driving electric.

  3. RNMentropy says:

    Please compare to the Nissan Pulsar with the Leaf, fairer.
    And all your comparisons are lacking maintenance costs.

    The most interesting comparisons are between a Pulsar and a Leaf, both used, 1~2 years old 😉

  4. Fernando Marques says:

    Nice blog you have here. I like your comparison, not by powertrain but by segment, that’s what makes sense, comparing a Bolt to a M3 for example is useless. This one i cannot really agree since Note is not really in Leaf class. I would do this analysis for a pulsar or an Astra/Cruze.

    Keep on the good work!

  5. nuno says:

    Dont forget that EV don´t pay IUC in Portugal (road tax payd every year) and the Note will pay at least around €100 every year.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger